• Modelers Alliance has updated the forum software on our website. We have migrated all post, content and user accounts but we could not migrate the passwords.
    This requires that you manually reset your password.
    Please click here, http://modelersalliance.org/forums/login to go to logon page and use the "Forgot your Password" option.

Kotare Spitfire

moon puppy

Administrator
Staff member
Well I guess I didn't get a photo of the box. You can google it.
I've sprayed Mr Surfacer primer on all the parts.
I'm kind amazed the part count in the box. I'll be working on the cockpit ASAP.
 
Here, here's a photo!
1768266586323.png


First coat of RAF interior green.
 
Well this will be interesting, basically a pre war Spit or baby Spit as they are sometimes called..
I always thought Tamiya missed a trick by not making their super spit an early Mk I ,II or V
 
I haven't finished a 1:32 aircraft in a long time other than WnW stuff, their foot print is not so bad but this thing is going to take up some space. While rambling in the shed the other day I realize I "think" I got another complete Tamiya Mustang that could be built. :hmm:
 
Working on the IP, the decals are amazing, much like the ol' WnW cockpits the instrument dials are for the most part individual.
Vallejo black for the panel, Mission paints for the RAF interior color. I gloss coated it to take the IP. I'll seal it with some flat to knock that texture off, it sure doesn't look like that in person. Just glossy.
1768614568361.png
 
Are you going with the wooden 2-bladed fan or the constant speed 3-bladed affair? This kit is all the rage among Just For Fun modelers on X.
The detail and fit is reputed to be amazing.
 
Unsure just yet. I got some more detail on the IP and the frame. I tried the Mission Models flat clear again, glossy again. Used the Alclad Aqua flat and it flatted right out.
@jknaus I see the aluminum call out, what aluminum would you suggest? Polish, dull or the RAF high speed flavor?
 
i am quite curious about the aluminium in the cockpit as well. Its not something i have ever seen in my 60 years ? What specifically was left in a natural finish ?
 
The only thing i agree with is the seat was resin bonded paper not Bakelite :)
As for the rest i am keeping out as its the reason i got banned before on Several sites :) its one of those occasions where no one will ever prove you wrong if you went black or green but people would always question black.
 
Thanks bob.
I tend to be surprised how soon after the death of the generation that knew for sure the facts on things like colour and detail are questioned by people that were not there or even born. New generations are now presented with colourized pictures' and digital screens that show colours as incorrect depending how the screen is set up and very soon these images become fact and history is changed.
in the mid 1960's i was 6 years old. The battle of Britain had taken place just 25 years previous. Houses in our street still had bomb damage and bomb sites where houses had stood were common in residential areas and were often our playgrounds.. I had an older brother also obsessed with the war and i guess for us England v Germany was our cowboys and Indians. Our hero's were fighter pilots and our comics were full of RAF "chaps" fighting the Bosch by day and down the pub in evening to celebrate the victories of the poor old hun who always got a pasting while shouting donner and blitzen as they spiralled to earth :) In 1969 the Battle of Britain Film came out , we lined up round the block to see it and at the time it was brilliant and the point was , the advisors for the film were the likes of

Key Advisors (Credited & Uncredited):
Why They Were Important:
  • Authenticity: They ensured the portrayal of aerial combat, aircraft, and command decisions reflected reality.
  • Aircraft & Stunts: Mahaddie's efforts secured the numerous Spitfires and Hurricanes used, while veterans helped stage the incredible aerial action.
  • Historical Accuracy: Their presence allowed for debates and corrections, contributing to the film's renowned realism.
So later in life i was really sad to see to see the debates and dismissal of the views of people that were there by people who were not , trying to analyse black and white pictures and come up with colours.
I will give you an example. Airfix always called out Duck egg blue as an underside colour for fighters. the Aircraft in the film were very much duck egg blue. colour footage and photos backed this up as far as one could tell. the colour chosen for the aircraft in the film was duck egg blue by people that were there and painted the aircraft at the factory.
Then along came the experts 50 years after the event...hang on, the Colour was Sky. Well yes that was the official name but Sky was Duck egg green. ? Yes but the official Docs i found also listed Sky 2 which was also called duck egg blue.:)

Anyway, long story short.
I was told i was being contrary, argumentative and trouble making and the likes of "Edgar" had forgotten more than i ever knew and was ostracized from the web site :) and even worse, i was told that the technical advisors on the film had got it all wrong and everyone knew it...


at which point i gave up and decided to move on. Now i think people should paint their models any colour they like because its almost impossible to prove them wrong in most cases and you are not building historical reference items you are building model that please you for your own entertainment.......which is why my current Fiat build is black and not red :cool: .
 
Peter Townsend, I always admired that bloke. Not only an accomplished fighter pilot and wooer of royalty, he was a founding member of a really great rock band.:silly:

I feel your pain Paddy, my pet peeve is the waste air vents behind the engine nacelles of a B17. People always put exhausts stains coming out of them, exhaust gases would NEVER enter that duct work.

Keep to your guns Paddy, we got your back!
 
Back
Top