Modelers Alliance has updated the forum software on our website. We have migrated all post, content and user accounts but we could not migrate the passwords.
This requires that you manually reset your password.
Please click here, http://modelersalliance.org/forums/login to go to logon page and use the "Forgot your Password" option.
I'm calling this done!
.............................
And here's a Tiger with a Panther. Now if i'm not mistaken, the Panter was a Medium tank, Tiger was a Heavy, so why does the Panther look bigger than the Tiger?
I'm calling this done!
.............................
And here's a Tiger with a Panther. Now if i'm not mistaken, the Panter was a Medium tank, Tiger was a Heavy, so why does the Panther look bigger than the Tiger?
Hi MP - the Tiger 1 was 56T, while the Panther was 43T.
They are physically the same size but the Tiger design was based on thinking from the late 30's and very early 40's - a further development of the classic mk4 super structure approach.
Then they ran into the T34 and had to match it - (etcetera)
Brokeneagle.