• Modelers Alliance has updated the forum software on our website. We have migrated all post, content and user accounts but we could not migrate the passwords.
    This requires that you manually reset your password.
    Please click here, http://modelersalliance.org/forums/login to go to logon page and use the "Forgot your Password" option.

AI colorization with ChatGpt experiments.

JSteinman

Master at Arms
9F7D2D0A-405E-49D9-ADFC-FE44DE5F89B7.png
IMG_0262.png
 
To me, the tank color seems too uniformed. Shadows are not well done, look at the spare wheel rack in the BW photo, very dark in the shade of the side armor of the turret.
I like how the car turned out.
 
The redeeming feature is that some details not easily seen pop out, like the band at the front of the turret skirt. For that reason, I like playing with it but wouldn't save it into my files unless adding notes like this:
1771595922404.png
 
You guys are correct, but your criticism doesn’t negate the usefulness of the exercise. It allows a better “immersion” into the scene and provides a better feel for me as I model a subject. It’s a tool like any other.
 
To me, the tank color seems too uniformed. Shadows are not well done, look at the spare wheel rack in the BW photo, very dark in the shade of the side armor of the turret.
I like how the car turned out.
I guess it is also about the control. The prompt used was as follows:
Archival colorization, push the chroma, no other changes permitted.
 
I think this sort of thing is great if its for private use but the Internet is awash with badly coloured or wrongly coloured B&W pictures. You often find people arguing over a point of detail like a rivet pattern or a marking and completely ignoring the fact the subject is the wrong colour.
With my current build , tying to find accurate original colours for Desert/Far east RAF schemes has been a nightmare as just when you think you have found the answer it turns out to be another colourized picture.

1771595922404b.png 1771595922404.png
 
Last edited:
Back
Top